Livnium Labs

Research with evidence, limits, and negative results included.

Labs tests unconventional representations against ordinary baselines. Findings are labeled Proven, Measured, Partial, Research, or Retired so early work cannot be mistaken for a finished product.

Status system

Every result says what kind of evidence it is.

Mathematical properties, benchmark measurements, partial causal evidence, prototypes, and retired ideas require different language. The label is part of the result.

Proven

Deterministic property

A mathematical or structural property established by derivation and reproducible tests.

Measured

Observed benchmark

A reported evaluation result with a known setup; not automatically a general capability.

Partial

Evidence with open controls

A promising result that still needs matched ablations, multiple seeds, or broader datasets.

Research

Active experiment

An idea, prototype, or mechanism still being evaluated and not ready for adoption claims.

Retired

Did not survive testing

A claim or direction kept in the record because knowing what failed is useful evidence.

LAB RULE

Baseline before story

Chance, simple linear methods, ordinary neural probes, leakage controls, and matched comparisons come first.

Measured AI

One result, its baselines, and the missing proof.

Supervised Collapse is an experimental learned-attractor classifier. The reported SNLI result is real, but the current record does not establish a unique causal advantage for collapse.

THE QUESTION

Did attractor collapse outperform an ordinary MLP?

Not in the current reported experiment. Collapse reached 68.92% on the SNLI test set; the frozen-embedding MLP probe reached 70.13%. Matched multi-seed testing remains pending.

WHY PUBLISH IT

Because the baseline is part of the result.

A result reported without its strongest ordinary baseline is marketing, not measurement. The full comparison, method, and open controls are below and in the repository.

Inspect the method →
Supervised Collapse68.92% SNLI testOne reported run; experimental learned-attractor model.
Frozen-embedding linear probe64.06%Simple baseline on the same learned representation.
Frozen-embedding MLP probe70.13%Stronger than Collapse in the reported comparison.
Next required testPENDINGMatched end-to-end, multi-seed ablations across datasets.

Correct interpretation: trained geometry matters for that checkpoint. The current evidence does not show that collapse is uniquely sufficient, state of the art, or a general reasoning mechanism.

Research programs

Models, representations, combinatorics, and methodology.

Each program links back to code or written evidence in the public repository. Research language is intentionally narrower than marketing language.

MeasuredNATURAL LANGUAGE

Supervised Collapse NLI

Learned entailment, neutral, and contradiction attractors evaluated on SNLI, with ordinary probes reported beside the model.

Inspect NLI work →
MeasuredEMBEDDINGS

Noun-Collapse representations

Word vectors learned through collapse dynamics and evaluated on semantic-similarity tasks.

View model record →
ResearchGENERATION

Compact premise generation

A small conditional generation program exploring whether learned-attractor representations can support label-directed text generation.

ResearchVISION

Vision Collapse

An early investigation of attractor dynamics over image data. Smoke-tested at small resolution; not a trained production vision system.

Verified toolingCOMBINATORICS

Ramsey and rotation tools

Solvers, witnesses, and group-action constructions. Standard and verified results are separated from retired novelty claims.

Negative recordRULE 30

Prediction investigation

A preserved case study showing why a compelling geometric story is not evidence of predictive power.

Known limits

Core preserves structure. It does not learn meaning.

Static Core geometry cannot learn or abstract by design. On artifact-free ANLI it performs around chance. Learned models built above Core are separate systems and must earn their own evidence.

DO NOT CLAIM

General reasoning from geometry

Core is not an AI model. It does not understand language, discover semantics, separate signal from noise, or replace ordinary learning.

DO CLAIM

Exact reversible structure

Core supports deterministic encoding, addressing, permutation, conserved weights, and inspectable group actions.

Collaborate with evidence

Have a hypothesis worth testing carefully?

Bring the claim, the strongest ordinary baseline, the data, and the result that would change your mind.

Discuss research →